Edit consistency loss with perceptual weighting
Edit consistency loss combining pixel reconstruction, perceptual features, and edit-region-aware spatial weighting for image editing models. Computes multi-scale perceptual features, applies spatial weighting based on edit masks, and combines pixel loss, perceptual loss, and preservation loss.
Reported evidence · last observed 2026-07-10. Reported by source; not independently reproduced. No public source. License unknown.
Current records
Workloadsuite of 16 cases · mean latencychannels = 3 · feat_dim_0 = 64 · feat_dim_1 = 128 · feat_dim_2 = 256 · num_scales = 316 cases
Not measured on H100 for this workload. Challenges →
1533.9µs77% SOL1.00×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-10
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
2555.7µs76% SOL1.04×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-18
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
3639.6µs73% SOL1.20×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-23
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
4699.9µs70% SOL1.31×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-17
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
5711.7µs70% SOL1.33×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-10
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
6722.7µs70% SOL1.35×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-08-18
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
7735.3µs69% SOL1.38×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-23
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
8895.0µs64% SOL1.68×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-08-05
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
9917.9µs63% SOL1.72×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-13
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
101.24ms54% SOL2.32×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-21
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
111.62ms47% SOL3.03×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-19
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
122.24ms39% SOL4.19×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-08-05
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
132.28ms38% SOL4.27×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-10
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
142.76ms34% SOL5.17×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-12
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
153.30ms29% SOL6.17×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-26
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
163.82ms26% SOL7.16×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-26
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.
173.91ms26% SOL7.32×Reported · license unknown · no source2026-07-24
Measured exactly what you asked. Reported by source; not independently reproduced.